What
Fétichism ?
The word “Fetishism” appears for the first time in 1760
. Charles De Brosses (1709-1777) in his book “Of the worship
of the Gods Fetishes” compares those of the ancient Egypt religion
with the pertaining of worship practices of Africa. The word “Fetish”,
comes from Portuguese “feitiça” a word which indicates
a magic object beneficial or evil. It is Diderot which then will officialize
the existence of these words in the dictionary of the Encyclopaedia.
Fetishism thus is related to a worship, whether it is spiritual or
sexual or both. The fetish object represents divinity and also allows
to communicate with it, it is at the same time symbol and medium,
and this fragmentation reduces the real or supposed danger of a direct
interaction with the divinity.






The
idea of a worship
In sexual fetishism, things seem a little similar, the fetishist is
devoted to his phantasm, but the presence of a partner is not necessarily
required, the possession and the use of the fetish object are enough
to bring an excitation sometimes even sufficient to reach orgasm…
This is why sexual fetishism has been classified a long time like
a perversion. The sexuality procreation purpose imposed by the religion
could indeed tolerate neither the masturbation practices nor the ludic
behaviors, and even less the association of both!
Fetishism and perversion
In
1816, Charles Fourier (1772-1837), more famous for his political engagements
(socialist Utopia) than his sexological writings, draws up the list
of what it names the sexual manias in a book entitled the “Le
nouveau monde amoureux” (that can be translated “new world
of love”). Charles Fourier rejects the expression of “sexual
deviation”, he invents in the place that of “polymorphic
pervert” who will make the delights of Freud later.

A perversion in some eyes
Fetishism was regarded a long time as a sexual perversion, the German
physician Kraft Ebing (1840-1902), classified it thus. However, at
the same time, other sexologists, relativized this evaluation, and
sought to redefine the borders of normal and pathological one. It
acted, inter alia, to finally cease excluding from the society people
whose sexuality was different from prudery standards: homosexual and
bisexual ones. The psychiatrist Magnus Hirschfeld (1868-1935) and
the English psychologist Havelock Ellis (1859-1939), contributed much
to this redefinition of perversion. Concerning fetishism, Havelock
Ellis wrote: ” the phenomena of erotic symbolism are those
which are most specifically human”. JM LoDuca, physician, sexologist,
defines fetishism as “a sexual perversion in which only one
part of the body (hair, hands or feet.) or only one part of clothing
excluding all the others stimulate the sexual desire.” There
is perversion when a dependence settles. The fetichism exclusive nature
justifies that it is qualified as a “perversion”. Perversion
begins when sexual arousal exclusively depends on fetish presence.

All concerned?
By
examining the things more closely, one realizes that we all are more
or less fetishistic. Homosexual heterosexual or, men and women, all
equal in front of their fetishes! It even seems that today in Europe,
the tendency encourage fetishistic expression, in various aspects
moreover like more sordid. Towards a redefinition of perversion philosophers
and artists support the sexological ideas and, like George Battaille
(writer) of Salvador Dali (plastician), or Maurice Heine rehabilitate
the work of Marquis de Sade by stressing its revolutionary dimension
rejecting strongly generally accepted ideas and others social and
religious constraints, and his will to redefine the erotic borders.
The conceptual framework is specified with work of Alfred Binet (1857-1911),
who considers sexual fetishism like a kind of religious worship. He
establishes a bond between fetishism and the monotheists worships:
indeed, fetishist focuses his devotion on an object separate of the
whole. The admirer of the feet or the shoes is not interested in the
hair, it dedicates an exclusive worship with the object elected like
fetish. Alfred Binet writes: “Fetishism in love tend to separate
completely, to isolate the object of his worship from all that surrounds
it and, when this object is part of an alive person, the fetishist
tries to make this part a independent unit.”
| Cutters of plaits
evoked by Magnus Hirschfeld were frightening fetishists. The author
reports the case of a young man having in his possession of tens
of plaits… Précisons that this “figaro”
was not a hairdresser !!! |
 |

top

Fetish
and phantasm
Always according to Alfred Binet, sexual fetishism can be consider
on two levels, one minor, not very elaborate or simply latent, it
is this fetishism to which he refers when he puts: “everyone
is more or less fetishist in love and there is a constant amount of
fetishism in the most regular love.” The other level, more complex
reflects the phantasm universe of fetishist. Alfred Binet seized the
abstract character of fetishism perfectly because he knew how to read
between the lines avoiding misunderstanding of the first appearances.
Contrary to still living believes, the fetishist is nor in the incapacity
to collect the signs of communication in love nor reduced to gather
them in an object, easier to handle, even if his behavior can be decoded.
Fetichism could be seen as the expression of an inner world, single,
individual, often of an extremely creative. Fetishism and phantasms
are always in a dialogue because they solicit the imaginary. The phantasm
builds a setting in scene, a history, gathers images, feelings, it
starts and accompanies the desire, leads to pleasure. The fetishes
objects are as many bench marks in the course of the phantasm, they
mark out the paths of imagination and make it possible to turn the
attention on the most erotic details.

How
does one becom fetishistic?
First experienced
event hypothesis.
It is still in Alfred Binet’s that one owes the assumption of
the “first experience” associated a sexual excitation
and then becomes a reference for erotic release. This idea will make
its way… In an article of 1927, Freud exposes his point of view,
for him, fetishism is male, it comes to mitigate anguish of castration
which does not fail to emerge when the child (of male sex) notes that
his mother does not have a penis. Definitely, this good man had great
difficulty to integrate the even existence femininity. Freud is astonished
that the fetishists that it observed find pleasure in adoring their
object because he thinks that this behavior characterizes the emotional
immature subjects, anxious, and self-confidence lack. Only the psychoanalytical
cure could put them on the right way of an adult sexuality.

Exclusively
male according to Freud
Freud
adds: “Probably no male could be saved from feeling the terror
of castration when he sees the female genital. For which reasons this
impression leads some to become homosexual and others to deny oneself
by creation a fetish, while the enormous majority overcomes this fear
that, certainly, we cannot say it.”
Freud explains how the fetish is built and why certain “objects”
are privileged: “The elaboration of a fetish follows processes
which appears very similar to a traumatic amnesia. Here also the interest
remains as left in way; last impression the worrying one of trauma
some will be kept like fetish. Thus if the foot or the shoe or part
of those are the preferred fetishes, they owe it with the fact that
in his curiosity the boy has stared at the genital of the woman starting
from the legs; fur and satin fixes - as it since is supposed a long
time - the spectacle of the genital hairs which would have had to
be followed of the female member ardently desired; the so frequent
election of the parts of linen room like fetish is due to that this
last moment is appointed of stripping, during which one still could
think that the woman is phallic. But I do not want to affirm
that each time can manage to know with certainty the determination
of the fetish. It is necessary to recommend the study urgently of
fetishism with all those which still doubt the existence of the complex
of castration or which can think that fear in front of the genital
of the woman has another base that it derives from, for example, of
the hypothetical memory of the trauma of the birth.”
Certain psychoanalysts dispute rightly the male exclusiveness in fetishism.
It should be remembered that the at the same time fetish plays a part
of representation and mediation. In the worship of the object, there
is a narcissistic gratification . For this reason, one can thus regard
as fetishists behaviors towards the fashion. When one endeavor to
follow the fashion, one adapts fetishes objects, clothing, shoes,
accessories which allow to be identified with an idol and to reinforce
one’s well being, one’s narcissism.


top
Fétichism
worship and adoration
Jean Streff Jean Streff in his book : “Traité du fétichisme”,
evokes a curious short new: A young mason who lives in a small mountain
village, was stopped whereas it flew of the linen put to dry on wires.
Policemen seeking to recover other catch parts came in the tiny room
where the young robber lived, “it was full up to the ceiling
with a mass of female linen inside which he had dug a hole to nest
there.” The German poet, Goethe, were known for his fetishism,
he wrote to his mistress Christine Vulpius: “On the next occasion,
please send to me your dancing shoes, worn down well by your exploits
and of which you wrote to me that they were like part of yourself
so that I could tighten against my heart.”
Charles
Baudelaire (1821-1867) in his famous book "Les fleurs du
mal." dedicates a poem to hair. Does Auguste Renoir think
about this poetry when he painted this gorgious haired joung
woman in 1894 ?
« Ô toison, moutonnant jusque sur l'encolure
!
Ô boucles ! Ô parfum chargé de nonchaloir
!
Extase ! Pour peupler ce soir l'alcôve obscure
Des souvenirs dormant dans cette chevelure,
Je la veux agiter dans l'air comme un mouchoir ! »
First lines of Baudelaire's « La chevelure »
|
|
Any object which can become object
of a fetishistic worship, rituals vary according to imagination and
phantasms'. Thus, sometimes the fetishist of the hair is satisfied
to touch it, to delight some for enhancing his desire, but also, he
wants to cut it, to own and use it for his solitary pleasures. Krafft
Ebing, with a very Germanic precision, quotes many cases of “cutters
of plaits”, some by having tens… The worship of the fetish
puts in scene all kinds of ritual, of the show, with the accomplished
sex act with or in the presence of the fetish object.

Various
fetish uses
Certain fetishists of bottoms or sticking, do not satisfy to admire
those carried by their mistress, they want to also taste the unutterable
delight to smell the caress on their skin, that belonged to the play.
It can be interesting to understand how the worship is organized,does
it works for reviving a former experiment, which role plays the object
there, is it fully actor of the phantasm, or only element of location,
does the ritual require a partner or not? Is it about a fetish object
which is addressed to the sight, hearing, the touch, the taste or
the sense of smell? If one wants to analyze the process, the reading
axes do not lack! The fetishist is often also a collector, refer to
the Riquet collection, which counts thousands of pairs of bottom.
Yves Riquet, computer engineer and large nylon stocking amateur won
the bet to give again a new breath with manufacturing of bottom “Gerbe”
which in 1998 the last unit was just about stopping producing nylon
stocking “crystal”. The machine which manufactures them,
a 25 meters length monster weighing close to 40 tons is impossible
to move, that's no problem, Yves Riquet founds a company of diffusion
which manages to to sell thousands nylon stocking pairs… The
business is profitable and the collection grows rich by new models
from modest to most prestigious ones. haut
de page